Back

Violetear Books

Kevin T. Norman
Get a Rec

Violetear Books

Kevin

Violetear Books, named after a hummingbird native to Mexico, believes in small things with great power. We publish bold, emotionally resonant fiction from underrepresented voices—stories that linger, challenge, and demand to be felt.

Swords & Seduction 💕

My Favorite Books

Say Gay Book Club 🌈

Back

Violetear Books

Kevin T. Norman

Violetear Books

Kevin

Get a Rec

Violetear Books, named after a hummingbird native to Mexico, believes in small things with great power. We publish bold, emotionally resonant fiction from underrepresented voices—stories that linger, challenge, and demand to be felt.

Swords & Seduction 💕

My Favorite Books

Say Gay Book Club 🌈

 Feed

 Bookshelf

 Membership


The Apple of Their Throat COVER REVEAL


2

Nov 12, 2025

Mean Lesbian Mommies


1 title featured

book cover

image

I hate being misunderstood. And in a world where one single post can haunt you for life, I censor myself constantly. I second-guess myself even when I know how I feel and what I believe is right. I overthink my wording, examine everything from all angles, and always land in the murky gray of nuance. Not because I’m too scared to choose a side, but because I can’t make myself forget the complexity of being human — and my empathy refuses to stop trying to understand.

Online, we strive for a world that is black and white because it spares us from sitting with hard questions and uncomfortable answers. But that kind of thinking limits progress. Everything becomes an online morality test, and I get lost in the virtue signaling and moral policing. I find myself wondering whether the advocacy I see is born from genuine care — or from the serotonin rush of calling out someone else’s behavior. Because if your advocacy starts and ends with a comment or a post, how much do you truly care about the thing you claim to fight for?

I am vocal online, but most of my advocacy happens off-screen. When I received negative comments accusing me of not supporting the St. Martins boycott or not speaking up enough for Palestine, those people had no idea I was donating thousands of dollars to relief aid. They didn’t know I was spending hours educating myself on something I had previously known very little about or that I was donating books to fundraisers to raise even more money.

Yes, being vocal online is important — it raises awareness. But when advocacy is weaponized against others, I start to question the ethics behind it.

I am not morally pure, no matter how hard I try to be. But what most people don’t see — or don’t want to see — is how much I care. I care about doing what is right. I care about making people happy. I care about standing up for others. I question myself constantly because I want to get it right. And still, I will stumble. I am messy. Maybe I don’t speak up as often as I should. Maybe I don’t always know how. But if you knew me — if you even took the time to know me — you would see how deeply I care.

The internet scares me. I’ve seen how your character can be dragged, twisted, and flattened into something easy for others to digest. I’ve read some of the nastiest things said about me — people messaging brands to get me fired, even trying to take away my publishing imprint. I have cried to my therapist and my partner more times than I can count. At one point, it got so bad I almost quit being a content creator altogether. Because despite knowing who I am and what I believe, I gaslit myself into thinking their version of me must be reality.

But all of this forced me to face my greatest fear: being misunderstood.

I became a book creator because queer books saved me when I was coming out, and I wanted to share that gift. My goal was to be an online resource for other queer people searching for themselves. Over time, that dream grew. I started talking about books in general, but stayed vocal about my queerness — something I had never dared to do online before. For so long, I believed I had to hide that part of myself to be liked. TikTok showed me that being fully myself was where I would find the most success.

So I stopped hiding. I wanted to be more than just a resource — I wanted to be an example that you don’t have to shrink yourself to fit in. That queer people deserve to have a voice in a world that tries to silence them. And as someone who is both mixed-race and gay, I have always felt like I didn’t fully belong anywhere. I was never “Mexican enough.” I was never “straight enough.” I had to work harder than my straight counterparts to achieve what I have — and that’s why every setback, every attempt to tear me down, hurts so deeply.

It’s not that I believe marginalized creators are beyond critique — but that critique weighs heavier than many realize. When people tried to make me lose my imprint, they didn’t just attack me — they threatened a publishing house built to amplify marginalized voices and stories.

I cannot avoid being misunderstood. People will always believe what they want to believe. And as painful as that is, I have to learn to be okay with it.

Actually — I am okay with it.

I am still figuring out who I am, but I can tell you everything I have done to get here. I am here because I refused to hide my queerness. I am here because I believe in diversity in our stories, and that is what I will continue to publish. I am here because I care. I am here because I believe in myself and the dreams I have for literature.

And I am here because of you.

If you’ve read this far, thank you. Truly. Your willingness to sit with these thoughts means more than I can say, and I’m so grateful you’re part of this community we are building together. If you’d like to help us go even further, the best way is by becoming a paid member of Violetear Books. I ask because I believe in us — in the kinds of diverse stories we are bringing into the world. Thanks to you, we have Inferno’s Heir, Tempest’s Queen, Black Salt Queen, and one more on the way. I cannot thank you enough for helping make that possible.

I want us to build Violetear Books so big that publishers can’t ignore us or our stories. I want to change publishing — and every single membership brings us one step closer to that goal.

A Confession: The Hardest Lesson I’ve Had to Learn Online


image

Let me start by saying that I absolutely despise J.K. Rowling. I think she is a vile human being. And yet, I can’t deny that her books shaped my childhood, made me the reader I am today, and that the movies were the glue that held my childhood friendships together. That nostalgia is real, and it coexists with the heartbreak I feel knowing the person behind it all holds harmful views. Both of these things can be true at once, and acknowledging one does not absolve the other.

With Harry Potter fan fiction making its way into mainstream publishing, I have been thrown into a rabbit hole of questions. Is fan fiction based on Harry Potter inherently bad? Do these newly published works somehow support Rowling? Would boycotting them even make a measurable difference in the bigger picture?

I have seen every argument online. Some people are adamant that Rowling profits from these books. Others insist she does not make a single penny from them. I have even seen people claim that if you read them, you must hate trans people, an extreme leap I simply do not believe. The world is not that black and white. Being human is layered and messy, and we all have to make peace with choices that do not fit into neat moral boxes.

I have no desire to support J.K. Rowling. For years, the consensus was that reading fan fiction was acceptable precisely because she did not benefit from it. But the conversation seemed to shift the moment fan fiction started being traditionally published, and suddenly the narrative became that buying these books means you are funding transphobia. What changed? And why?

Part of the argument is that these works “keep the Harry Potter IP alive.” In a sense, that may be true. Whenever we link them to Harry Potter, we keep the association fresh in people’s minds. But paradoxically, the louder we are about condemning them, the more oxygen we give to that connection. What is meant to discourage engagement can end up amplifying it.

Alchemised, the book at the center of much of this debate, has been rewritten to remove Harry Potter characters, names, and settings so it could be published legally as an original work by Del Rey. There is no evidence of a licensing deal with Rowling or Warner Bros., which would have been required if Harry Potter IP were still present. Warner Bros. is famously protective of the franchise and would never allow a non-canon, unapproved book to be published under any official association with Harry Potter unless they were directly involved and profiting. The seven-figure film rights deal Legendary Entertainment made for Alchemised was with the author and their representatives, not Rowling. As far as public record shows, Rowling is not in the chain of payment, with no royalties and no participation.

That does not mean there is zero connection. The book is marketed with the fact that it started as Harry Potter fan fiction, and that discourse does keep Harry Potter culturally relevant. Rowling profits most directly from book sales, licensing, and her upcoming television series, massive, guaranteed revenue streams that far outweigh a handful of books she legally has no rights to.

This also leaves me wondering when fan fiction becomes its own thing, if ever. Some argue it can never be separated from its source, that changing names and places is not enough. But if someone picked up Alchemised without any knowledge of its origin, they might never suspect it was once inspired by Harry Potter. Does time, shifting culture, or the depth of a rewrite eventually make a work original in its own right?

If we knew for certain that Rowling does not profit from these books, would that change how we view them? Would that make it acceptable to buy and read them, or does any connection to Harry Potter, no matter how far removed, still feel like a step too close? And what about those who choose to read them anyway? Does their choice say something about their values, or is it simply one of many complicated ways people navigate a world where art and artist are often entangled? I do not have a clean answer. Maybe the more important work is asking these questions at all, and allowing ourselves to wrestle with what they mean for us.

Does Reading a Book Like Alchemised Make You Complicit?